#HEAD FOR FACEBOOK FULL#
#HEAD FOR FACEBOOK TV#

This summer’s Paramount+ feature Beavis and Butt-Head Do the Universe was a more effective positioning of the characters within our modern context, as they had to learn about white privilege and carceral injustice and did so in their own inimitable fashion.

#HEAD FOR FACEBOOK FULL#

Their 2011 MTV revival was solid if unremarkable, more a toe’s dip in the new millennium’s cultural waters than a full immersion.

#HEAD FOR FACEBOOK TV#

He argued that Russia’s electronics industry is able to produce components that are “quite acceptable” and that Russia can work with unnamed countries that have not imposed relevant sanctions.So it isn’t the least bit surprising that these characters, birthed in a 1992 short film and then popularized in a 1993-1997 TV series, would be fully adaptable to new generations of media literacy with almost no alterations at all. He said a “radical restructuring” of Russia’s space industry may be required to improve production, a process he said will be hindered by Western sanctions that restrict the export of satellite-related technologies to Russia. “If we compare today the state of the space groups of the main players in this market - Americans, Europeans and Chinese - they have long overtaken us in this regard,” he said in the interview, which came after a visit to a Russian spacecraft manufacturer, Lavochkin. Borisov, previously deputy prime minister with responsibilities that included the defense and space industries, acknowledged that Russia had fallen behind other nations in satellite manufacturing. It’s got good years left.”īorisov took over as head of Roscosmos July 15, replacing Dmitry Rogozin, who was dismissed by Putin. “We are working to extend the International Space Station to 2030. “We are staying the course,” NASA Associate Administrator Bob Cabana said July 27 at the International Space Station Research and Development Conference. Other NASA officials insisted after Borisov’s earlier comments that there is no near-term change in ISS operations planned, including no formal notification from Roscosmos of its intent to withdraw from the partnership. “We’re not seeing crew time as a limiting factor.” “We’re flush with crew time,” said Kirt Costello, chief scientist for the ISS program at NASA, during a briefing in June. NASA officials, by contrast, have emphasized there is abundant time available for doing research on the U.S. segment, are now spending time on station maintenance that begins “to exceed all reasonable limits” and thus takes away from research activities. He added that ISS crews, including those on the U.S. Because of that, “about two years ago we began to seriously think about the continuation of the manned program and the development of a domestic orbital station.” He said Russian engineers were concerned there could be “avalanche-like” failures of systems on aging modules. “From a scientific point of view, we do not see any additional dividends, stretching this process until 2030,” he said of that research.Īnother issue involves maintenance of the station.

One was his belief that Russia would soon exhaust the research it wanted to conduct on the station. That is expected no earlier than 2028.īorisov expressed skepticism in the interview that Russia will remain involved with the station until 2030. Industry sources said that Roscosmos officials have privately advised NASA that Russia is unlikely to withdraw from the ISS before it starts launching modules for the Russian Orbital Service Station, a new national space station.

Whether it will be in mid-2024 or 2025 - it all depends, in fact, including on the state of performance of the ISS itself.” “We just said that after 2024 we are starting the exit process. “We haven’t warned about it yet, there’s no need for it,” he said of withdrawal. The withdrawal process, he added, could take up to two years. He said Russia would abide by the intergovernmental agreement for the ISS partners that requires countries to provide at least one year’s notice before withdrawing.